Lean converses with Coward between setups on "In Which We Serve." |
I was fortunate to write up the Criterion Collection's excellent four-film set of David Lean's direction of Noel Coward's work in his first outings as a director for Film International in 2013. It has only seen print to date --
“I loved its follies and apathies and curious streaks of
genius,” wrote Noel Coward of his decision to return to England when World War
II began. Had he not, the rise of David Lean would not have been deterred, but
it may not have been as swift or as assured.
Coward provided Lean with writing that was strong and
well-structured; Lean, as an already accomplished editor, knew how film worked.
He could eliminate the extraneous. He had a keen sense of how to breathe
cinematic life into a flat concept or character. Lean serves the material;
later he will serve himself, with ever-more preposterous results.
Their mutually beneficial relationship is captured
definitively in Criterion’s new box set. The first film in the series, the
breathtaking World War II propaganda film “In Which We Serve,” was written for
the screen; the next three – “This Happy Breed,” “Blithe Spirit,” and “Brief
Encounter,” are stage-derived. Lean solves the problems put to him in two out
of three cases by the plastic limitations of the material, at best with
“Encounter,” but to middling effect in “Breed” -- and comes up empty in
“Spirit.”
When the war began, Coward was in a unique and ambivalent
position. A tremendously popular entertainer, he was a prolific songwriter and
playwright with a reputation as an effete, cutting drawing-room wit whose
undeclared but obvious homosexuality both amused and repelled England’s middle
class. Coward had written his grand stage chronicles of English life,
“Cavalcade” and “This Happy Breed”; his patriotism was showing. He volunteered
for the war effort in numerous ways, and “In Which We Serve” was the grandest
of these, earning Coward an honorary Oscar and an air of unassailable
legitimacy.
Coward, in particular, was making a huge gamble. His
insistence on making it “his” project included casting himself as the brave
Captain Kinross, master of the destroyer Torrin.
Coward’s portrayal of a noble, unaffected, and incredibly straight naval
officer was probably his greatest performance. Coward’s Kinross is absolutely
calm, repressed to the point of being wooden; an apt critique of the
heterosexual male stereotype in performance. (Later, Coward would overhear
criticism of his performance from a neighboring table at a restaurant. As he
left, he flounced over the offenders, put his hands on his hips, and hissed,
“Well, I thought I was VERY GOOD!”)
Coward knew he needed top help to realize his project. He
selected talents such as future Oscar winners and nominees Lean, producer
Anthony Havelock-Allan, cinematographer Ronald Neame, and camera operator Guy
Green. Likewise, his casting initiated long-term relationships between Coward
and Lean and actors such as Bernard Miles, John Mills, Kay Walsh, Joyce Carey,
Celia Johnson, and Richard Attenborough.
Neame’s inky shadows and sharp highlights lend depth and
dimension to the combat scenes, a nourish contrast to the traditionally lit
domestic and flashback scenes. This high-contrast look will maintain itself in
all succeeding black-and-white Lean films.
Lean, known already as the best film editor in England, now
showed his organizational and leadership capabilities. Although he was a
notoriously bad hand at drawing, he resolutely storyboarded the action -- and
annotated his shooting script to within an inch of its life before hitting the
soundstage. “All the important imaginative thinking, he (Lean) maintained, had
to be done before the shooting commenced; there was no time for lengthy improvisations
on the set when a director was working with numerous actors and technicians.”
(1) This thoroughness and discipline served him well in future; his stone-faced
seriousness on set would later lead to rifts with more easygoing colleagues
such as Trevor Howard and Robert Mitchum.
Lean began production on “In Which We Serve” as a glorified
assistant director; however, Coward wearied of the time-consuming, technical
rigors of film direction and turned over the helm entirely to Lean after a few
weeks. Even in his first effort, some of Lean’s trademarks -- confident pacing,
deep-focus shots, and close attention to the human face -- are evident. “. . .
.the fact that Lean was able to stamp his personal style upon a production
overshadowed by Coward’s looming (and egotistical) presence says much for his
ability.” (2)
Overcoming a initial lack of support and cooperation from
the British military with an intervention from King George VI himself, Coward
and Lean’s film wound up on release to be quite literally a rousing success,
serving as a template for the stiff-upper-lip heroics of war films to come. The
fruitful association continued.
“This Happy Breed” was a sentimental, historical stage epic
in the style of Coward’s previous “Cavalcade” of 1931 (that show initiated the
cliché in which a loving shipboard couple wanders away from in front of a life
preserver . . . labeled “H.M.S. Titanic”!). Where “Cavalcade” profiled the
upper crust, “Breed” looks warmly, if condescendingly, at the working class.
"This Happy Breed" |
It’s another tribute to the spirit of embattled England,
studded with heartaches and happiness, rendered in a deliberately dull
Technicolor palette to more accurately reflect the dingy reality of plebian
life. It’s an uneven if deeply felt panorama that fails to engage.
“ . . .he took every mundane event the cinema avoided –
washing up, drying clothes, a great many meals – and worked the dialogue into
them. For a British film to do this was unusual enough, but to show the kitchen
sink, albeit in muted Technicolor, was revolutionary.” (3) This, along with a
not-so-obscure moralizing about the comeuppance of those who don’t know how to
“keep their place” oddly presages the conventions of British “kitchen-sink”
social realism that were to flower 12 years later with John Osbourne’s “Look
Back in Anger.”
“Blithe Spirit,” a farce about ghosts and fidelity, initially
hailed as a masterful work, has not stood the test of time. Its brittle
drawing-room sauciness is a return to form for Coward, and it had a long and
happy run on stage in London. However, in Lean’s hands, the jokes fall flat –
male lead Rex Harrison waspishly declared years later that it’s useful to make
a comedy with a director who knows what’s funny. It is known best watched for
its Oscar-winning special effects and Margaret Rutherford’s definitive
performance as the batty medium Madame Arcati.
"Blithe Spirit" |
Lean and Coward’s final collaboration, “Brief Encounter,”
equals “In Which We Serve” in quality and significance. A third adaptation of a
Coward stage work, it tells the story of two married people who meet by chance
in a railway station, fall in love, realize that an affair would destroy them
both, and part.
It’s a fever-dream, stream-of-consciousness visual poem
punctuated with the heavy thuds of “realities” to be faced up to bravely. Our
narrator and protagonist, Laura (Celia Johnson is absolutely perfect as the
clipped, overwrought, unconventionally ravishing heroine) feels so keenly the
lost chance that Alec (Trevor Howard as a noble young doctor) represents that
she contemplates throwing herself under a train a la Karenina in the
penultimate scene.
"Brief Encounter" |
As is the case in almost every subsequent Lean film, the
willing spirit is chained by the weak flesh, the social imperative. Wild,
nonconformist impulses threaten the blasé normality from which they sprung and
are snuffed out ruthlessly. Tellingly, Lean is quoted as saying: “I am drawn to
the person who refuses to face defeat even when they realize that their most
cherished expectations may go unfulfilled.” (4)
Like Rosy Ryan in “Ryan’s Daughter,” Zhivago, Lawrence, and
Nicholson in “The Bridge on the River Kwai,” Laura is swept out of and above mundane
reality by her passionate obsession, but is flung to earth. In the end she does
the right thing – and crushes out her soul like a cigarette butt.
Coward and Lean both moved on to reach iconic heights –
Coward as a sort of aging roué, and Lean as the eminence grise of cinema, for
better and worse. To watch these four films in chronological order is to see
Lean grow from a contractor to a fully assured artist who is ready to do what
he needs to make his vision come to life.
- “Beyond the Epic: The Life
and Films of David Lean,” Gene D. Phillips, pg. 55.
- “Noel Coward: A
Biography,” Philip Hoare, pg. 328.
- “David Lean: A Biography,”
Kevin Brownlow, pg. 181.
- Phillips, pg. 96.
DAVID LEAN DIRECTS NOEL COWARD
Including:
In Which We Serve (1942)
This Happy Breed (1944)
Blithe Spirit (1945)
Brief Encounter (1945)
In Which We Serve (1942)
Director Noel Coward, David Lean
Screenplay Noel Coward
Producer Noel Coward
Director of Photography Ronald Neame
Art Director David Rawnsley
With Noel Coward (Capt. E.V. Kinross, R.N.), Bernard Miles
(Chief Petty Officer Hardy), John Mills (Ordinary Seaman ‘Shorty’ Blake), Celia
Johnson (Mrs. Kinross), Joyce Carey (Mrs. Hardy), Kay Walsh (Freda Lewis),
James Donald (Doc), Derek Elphinstone (Number 1), Michael Wilding (Flags),
Robert Sansom (Guns), Philip Friend (Torps), Richard Attenborough (Young Powder
Handler – uncredited)
Runtime 114 minutes
This Happy Breed (1944)
Director David Lean
Screenplay Noel Coward (uncredited), Anthony Havelock-Allan,
David Lean, Ronald Neame
Producer Noel Coward, Ronald Neame (Neame uncredited)
Director of Photography Ronald Neame
Art Director C.P. Norman
With Robert Newton (Frank Gibbons), Celia Johnson (Ethel
Gibbons), Reg (John Blythe), Vi (Eileen Erskine), Kay Walsh (Queenie), Stanley Holloway (Bob Mitchell), John Mills (Billy
Mitchell), Amy Veness (Mrs. Flint), Alison Leggatt (Aunt Sylvia)
Runtime 111 minutes
Blithe Spirit (1945)
Director David Lean
Screenplay David Lean, Ronald Neame, Anthony Havelock-Allan,
Noel Coward (Coward uncredited)
Producer Noel Coward
Director of Photography Ronald Neame
Art Director C.P. Norman
Costumes Rahvis (dresses only)
With Rex Harrison (Charles Condomine), Constance Cummings
(Ruth), Kay Hammond (Elvira), Margaret Rutherford (Madame Arcati), Jacqueline
Clarke (Edith)
Runtime 96 minutes
Brief Encounter (1945)
Director David Lean
Screenplay Noel Coward, Anthony Havelock-Allan, David Lean,
Ronald Neame (latter three uncredited)
Producer Noel Coward, Anthony Havelock-Allan, Ronald Neame
(latter two uncredited)
Director of Photography Robert Krasker
Art Director Lawrence P. Williams (as L.P. Williams)
With Celia Johnson (Laura Jesson), Trevor Howard (Dr. Alec
Harvey), Cyril Raymond (Fred Jesson), Stanley
Holloway (Albert Godby), Joyce Carey (Myrtle Bagot)
Runtime 86 minutes
DVD
Produced and Distributed by The Criterion Collection (region
1)
Aspect Ratio 1:37:1
Sound Mix Mono
Extras New high-definition digital transfers of the BFI
National Archives’ 2008 restorations. Audio commentary on Brief Encounter by film historian Bruce Eder. Interviews with
Coward scholar Barry Day on all four films. Interview with Ronald Neame, short
documentaries on the making of In Which
We Serve and Brief Encounter, TV
documentary David Lean: A Self Portrait (1971),
1992 episode of The Southbank Show on
the life and career of Coward, 1969 audio recording of conversation between
Coward and Attenborough, trailers, 46-page booklet with essays by Ian Christie,
Terrence Rafferty, Farran Smith Nehme, Geoffrey O’Brien, and Kevin Brownlow.
No comments:
Post a Comment