NFR Project: “12 Angry Men”
Dir: Sidney Lumet
Scr: Reginald Rose
Pho: Boris Kaufman
Ed: Carl Lerner
Premiere: April 10, 1957
96 min.
Question: how do you make a dynamic film out of a bunch of talking heads?
This was the problem set out for first-time feature film director Sidney Lumet. His ingenious solution to this problem enlivens 12 Angry Men, a film that takes place almost entirely in a small, crowded New York courthouse room where jurors debate the guilt or innocence of a teenager accused of murder.
Lumet had already earned a reputation as a top-notch director of actors in his work for television prior to this assignment. He was a classic East Coast artist, a New Yorker who, as his career developed, painted many pictures of the city on film. Here he takes a dozen excellent actors and puts them through their paces, creating an absorbing drama about the judicial system and the frailties of human perception and decision-making.
The drama was originally written for television, appearing on Studio One on Sept. 20, 1954. The writer, Reginald Rose, was inspired by his own jury duty. Back in the early days of television, everything was done live, much as in a stage play. Adept and sensitive direction was needed to pull off this difficult creative feat – and another future film director, Franklin J. Schaffner, was at the helm for the broadcast.
When the film opens, we are briefly shown the face of the young defendant, tense and aggrieved. We quickly move to the jury room, into which our players file. Eleven jurors vote guilty; one man (Henry Fonda) votes not guilty. The majority complain and harass Fonda, but as he begins to articulate his objections to the evidence presented, minds are changed. Mind you, Fonda does not declare that the boy is innocent, he simply harbors a reasonable doubt as to his guilt and therefore is reluctant to sentence him to death.
The cast is a cross-section of (white male) humanity. There is the principled Fonda, an insecure jury foreman (Martin Balsam), a meek bank teller (John Fiedler), a couple of angry, prejudiced business owners (Lee J. Cobb and Ed Begley), an immigrant watchmaker (George Voskovec), a silly ad man (Robert Webber), a retired man (Joseph Sweeney), a house painter (Edward Binns), a stockbroker (E.G. Marshall), and two other working-class jurors (Jack Klugman and Jack Warden).
The day is hot, with a rainstorm threatening. Sweating and arguing, the twelve go over the testimony given to them again and again. Fonda wears down the certainty of the voters for guilt; eventually he convinces all of them to vote not guilty. As this happens, we are given essential details about each and every juror, giving each of them a distinct character and viewpoint.
So how did Lumet do it? He started with the camera poised slightly above the heads of the actors; gradually, he brings the camera down to level with their faces, and then, in the last third of the film, he shoots from below, letting the performers’ faces loom over the audience. Gifted with outstanding performances from everyone involved, the merciless close-ups that make up the film are filled with excellently underplayed reactions.
The result is a commanding meditation on the flimsy nature of the implementation of human justice, and the prejudices and mental shortcuts that cause people to make bad decisions. Fonda is the voice of reason here; the men respond to his quiet insistence that the boy may not be guilty with varying degrees of disbelief and credulity. Is justice served? Perhaps; the system calls for a unanimous verdict, and this particular jury comes down on the side of innocence. We can but hope that, if we were ever in the defendant’s position, there would be a Henry Fonda on the jury.
The NFR Project is one writer’s attempt to review all the films listed in the National Film Registry in chronological order. Next time: The Bridge on the River Kwai.


