Tuesday, June 23, 2026

NFR Project: 'The Living Desert' (1953)

 

NFR Project: “The Living Desert”

Dir: James Algar

Scr: James Algar, Winston Hibler

Pho: Robert H. Crandall, N. Paul Kenworthy

Ed: Norman R. Palmer

Premiere: Nov. 9, 1953

69 min.

Oh my God! Disney makes another film that I hate.

OK. A graduate student made a film of two insects fighting. He showed the footage to Walt Disney. Disney came up with idea of making a feature-length documentary about the lives of desert animals. The result is this, a jokey tour through the American desert environment and a profile of its denizens.

As is usual, Disney anthropomorphizes everything, even mud. The filmmakers built glass cases and put various natural enemies together in these environments, and filmed the conflicts. Thus the film is something of a series of cage matches engineered to provide exciting if not accurate footage. A cute musical soundtrack garnishes the film, cueing the audience as to how to respond to the film. Condescending. All the animals are cute and quirky, even the snakes and the spiders. The film is almost redeemed at the end by showing us a montage of time-lapse blooming desert flowers.

This film would prove to be a template for the hundreds of Disney nature films to follow – cutesy-poo writing, jocular narration, and contrived footage. This slap-happy approach to nature film would poison the genre for decades.

The NFR Project is one writer’s attempt to review all the films listed in the National Film Registry in chronological order. Next time: The Naked Spur.

NFR Project: 'Little Fugitive' (1953)

 

NFR Project: “Little Fugitive”

Dir: Ray Ashley, Morris Engel, Ruth Orkin

Scr: Ray Ashley, Morris Engel, Ruth Orkin

Pho: Morris Engel

Ed: Ruth Orkin, Lester Troob

Premiere: Oct. 6, 1953

80 min.

This film is revolutionary. It flies in the face of feature-film values as codified and exercised by the major film studios of the time. It is a hand-crafted, naturalistic little masterpiece.

Morris Engel was the prime mover of this project, an experienced photojournalist who wanted to make a film in a new way. Redesigning a hand-held movie camera created to be used in combat conditions, Engel wound up with an unobtrusive recording device that was shoulder-mounted, held at the waist, with a viewfinder that one looked down into. This allowed footage to be captured on the sly, without anyone noticing. This means that, in a film filled with milling crowds, every action and reaction of the bystanders was spontaneous and unrehearsed. (He shot in black-and-white, and silent; all the dialogue and sound effects was dubbed in post-production.)

Engel, Ashley, and Orkin came up with a simple story to tell. In Brooklyn, seven-year-old Joey lives with his 12-year-old brother Lennie and his widowed mother in a cramped lower-income apartment. The mother has to go and care for her own sick mother, so she leaves Lennie in charge of Joey for a day. Lennie resents this, and decides to play a prank on Joey. He and his friends convince Joey that he has shot and killed his brother; they tell him to go and hide himself.

Joey takes this very seriously. He goes home and grabs the six dollars his mother had left out for groceries and, avoiding all the policemen he sees, gets on the subway. It takes him to the boardwalk and amusements of Coney Island. There he actually thrives, happily riding rides and eating junk food. Joey is obsessed with horses, and when he finds a pony ride, he yearns to go on it – but he has spent all his money. He learns from another kid the trick of picking up and returning empty glass soda bottles on the beach for money. This he does, and rides over and over, until the pony-ride man asks him who he’s there with.

Joey gets scared and runs away, and ends up sleeping out in the open under the boardwalk. His brother, meanwhile, is frantic. He repents tricking his brother and searches for him fruitlessly.

The next morning, Joey wakes and returns to the pony ride. Finally, the pony-ride man tricks Joey into giving him his name and address. He looks up Joey’s phone number and calls his home. Lennie answers, and begs the man to hang on to Joey until he gets there. However, Joey sees the man talk to a policeman, and he takes off again. Now Lennie searches among the crowds at the beach. He spots Joey but then loses him. It’s only when it starts to rain that Lennie finds Joey all by himself, still picking up empty bottles. He tenderly brings him home again.

They get to the house and arrange themselves in front of the TV. Their mother returns minutes later. She thinks they have spent the entire day indoors and promises them that, on the weekend, she will take them to Coney Island as a treat. The brothers look at each other ruefully.

All of the actors Engel and company used were amateurs. There is definitely a script, but the filming is so low-key and natural that the drama appears to be improvised. Engel was a masterful photographer, and the visuals in the film – the gritty streets of Brooklyn, the fanciful confines of Coney Island, the play of the waves on the shore, are all rendered exquisitely. The images are sharp and gorgeous.

The filmmakers easily take us into the mind of the child at the center of the film. He is wracked by guilt, afraid of the cops, but then is easily distracted by pleasures the amusement park affords. In making a movie about ordinary life, the filmmakers seem to have taken a page from the Italian neorealists, who filmed stories about the lower classes and the poor on location with amateur actors. In turn, this film is said to have influenced the directors of French New Wave cinema.

At any rate, the key here is that, with no money, few resources, and a cast and crew of volunteers, Engel, Ashley, and Orkin created a compelling and coherent fiction film – one that can stand up against anything put out by Hollywood. American filmmaking of the time was studio-centered. The idea that you could use film to create your own unique, home-grown stories would lay dormant in the U.S. until the advent of the independent productions, so-called “personal” films, helmed by director/writer/actor John Cassavetes in the late 1950s.

Another of the filmmakers’ great achievements is capturing the look and feel of a certain place and a certain time. It’s New York City on a summer’s day in the early 1950s. The clothes, the manners, the surroundings are all preserved forever. It’s a specificity that generates universal understanding, a sympathy for the kids and the helpful adults who come together to tell this charming little tale.

The NFR Project is one writer’s attempt to review all the films listed in the National Film Registry in chronological order. Next time: The Living Desert.

Sunday, June 21, 2026

NFR Project: 'House of Wax' (1953)

 

NFR Project: “House of Wax”

Dir: Andre de Toth

Scr: Crane Wilbur

Pho: Bert Glennon, Peverell Marley

Ed: Rudi Fehr

Premiere: April 25, 1953

88 min.

“I’m going to give the people what they want – sensation, horror, shock. Send them out into the streets to tell their friends how wonderful it is to be scared to death.”

Thus sayeth Vincent Price as Professor Henry Jarrod, a sculptor who specializes in creating wax works in the images of the famous – and infamous – dead. House of Wax is the film that establishes actor Price as the modern Master of the Macabre.

He had played sinister characters in film before. He essayed a Gothic antihero to perfection in Dragonwyck (1946); he appeared as Cardinal Richelieu in Gene Kelly’s Three Musketeers in 1948. True, he was the Invisible Man in The Invisible Man Returns (1940), but Jarrod is his first monster.

In this case, the film is a lavish recreation of an older horror hit. Universal turned The Phantom of the Opera (1925) into a musical extravaganza in Technicolor in 1943; this was Warner Brothers’ version of that. They took the visually innovative Mystery of the Wax Museum (1933) – one of the last of the two-strip color features – and made it in color, 3D, and stereophonic sound. It was derived from the 1932 work by Charles S. Belden, who had made a play of it as well as an unpublished short story. That movie featured the inimitable Lionel Atwill as the accursed sculptor.

It is set in New York at the turn of the 20th Century. Jarrod (Price) runs a “respectable” wax works, but his business partner wants out of the not-so-profitable venture. He proposes burning down the building and taking the insurance money. Jarrod violently disagrees, calling the wax figures his children. The partner sets fire to the place, and after an epic battle Jarrod vanishes into the flames.

The partner gets all the insurance money. A disfigured monstrosity clad in black strangles him and makes his death look like a suicide. He then murders a young woman (Carolyn Jones) and steals her body. The victim’s friend, Sue Ellen, interrupts the murder and becomes the maniac’s target.

Jarrod reappears, wheelchair-bound, hands crippled by the fire. He is determined to reopen his wax museum, but he time he intends to fill it with bone-chilling recreations of famous crimes. He has two assistants (one of them, a deaf-mute, played by Charles Businski, soon to be Charles Bronson) who prepare the, uh, bodies for display. The museum opens, and we are shown a rendering of Joan of Arc that looks exactly like her dead friend.

Suspicious, Sue Ellen breaks into the museum – and discovers that her friend’s corpse is under the coat of wax. Jarrod suddenly appears, able to walk after all. Jarrod has been killing people and turning them into wax figures. Sue Ellen pounds at his face – which shatters, being a wax mask that shows the monster underneath. He subdues her and prepares her to be turned into a statue, his Marie Anntoinette. The police break in and save her and Jarrod falls to his death in a vat of boiling wax.

The film works, although it has a gimmicky aspect that greatly influenced its reception. It’s the first 3D feature film released by a major studio (Bwana Devil [1952] was first). It boasts a gorgeous if garish Technicolor look, and boasts stereophonic sound. All these innovations were designed to woo viewers away from their television sets – TV being the cutting-edge technology of the day. You couldn’t get 3D thrills at home!

The director, Andre de Toth, only had one eye – which rendered him unable to judge 3D effects. They are confined to bodies falling into the screen, a ludicrous demonstration of paddle-ball skill, and the display of ladies’ limbs as they dance the cancan. Still, the novelty sold tickets, and House of Wax came in second at the box office that year.

Ultimately, it is Price’s movie. He was at his best playing men “besieged by fate and out for revenge,” as he put it. Here he plays the erudite artist and the ravening monster beneath it with inestimable skill.

The NFR Project is one writer’s attempt to review all the films listed in the National Film Registry in chronological order. Next time: Little Fugitive.