The Cry of the
Children
Dir: George Nichols
1912
28:01
The 1910s in America were filled with sentiments of reform. It was the end of
the Progressive Era that brought social activism and political reform into the
culture. This film displays, for one of the first times in cinema, the ability
of the medium to expose substandard conditions and injustice. Of course, it
“sells” these idea through the conventions of the stage melodrama, and through
that, the Dickensian superpathos of the poor, including the traditional
child-crucifixion, in which a helpless youngster dies, primarily in order to
serve as a rebuke to society’s neglect.
Shot by the short-lived Thanhouser Company of New Rochelle,
NY, the dramatic short gives us the squalid lives of a working family whose
life is only lit by the presence of the youngest child, Little Alice. (Little
Alice evidently stays alone in the wretched hovel they call home, winsomely
dusting whilst the clan toils.) The wife of the rich, ruthless mill owner sees
Little Alice and wants to adopt her for cash. No dice, says the tyke.
When the mother becomes ill, the youngest must work in her
place at the mill, and the danger and drudgery drives her to the mill owner’s
mansion, where she begs to be adopted. But no! They got a cockapoo instead. Little
Alice goes back to the mechanical looms, where she quickly expires dramatically,
downstage center.
On the way back from the funeral, Little Alice’s mother
berates the mill owner’s wife as she and her husband drive past the unfortunates.
Little Alice’s family is somewhat comforted by an angelic vision of her, but in
their palatial mansion the mill owner’s wife is stricken with conscience. A
quick, masterful set of dissolves shows her, the mill, a relay of the child’s
death, the funeral procession, and back to the rich couple.
It’s conventionally shot otherwise. James Cruze, the future
director of many silents, stars as the father and Little Alice was played by
Marie Eline, whom the studio was trying to build up as a celebrity, the Thanhouser
Kid.
The strangest parts of the film turns out to be the scenes
filmed inside or in front of an unidentified factory. It’s easy to tell the
actors from the workers by the pancake makeup used, and the intermingling of
reality and narrative is odd, especially as the film is an indictment of such
factories. Maybe the novelty of it lowered the owners’ guard. At any rate,
there we are, watching as the characters work the actual machines. Everyone
eaves the factory at the end of the day, the actors shuffled in among the
people they are supposed to be portraying. It won’t be the last of film’s
Alice-in-Wonderland moments.
It's instructive that, despite her sorrow at the death her husband's factory causes, the mill owner's wife does nothing. It’s heavy-handed, as much “muckraking” non-fiction and fiction by the likes of Upton Sinclair and Frank Norris tended to be. But it provides no solutions, no plan of action. The poor are to be pitied, and that's about it. Progressives
and crusaders loved it; Woodrow Wilson cited it in his 1912 campaign. However, child
labor wasn’t outlawed until 1938, and is still largely legal in the
agricultural industry.
The NFR
Project is an attempt to review all the films listed in the National Film
Registry, in chronological order. Next time: ‘A Cure for Pokeritis.’
No comments:
Post a Comment