'Lady Helen's Escapade' -- where is it? |
Lady Helen’s Escapade
Dir: D.W. Griffith
1909
8 min.
At last, an entry that allows me to say: what gives?
This film is very difficult to find; in fact, I can’t find
it. Normally, I do pretty well with research. If by chance you know where and
how I might watch it, please let me know! I am particularly happy to find out
if I’ve overlooked some resource or research technique, so that I can get better
at this.
I am able to find mentions via Mubi, and Roberta E. Pearson’s
excellent “The Transformation of Performance Style in the Griffith Biograph
Films,” and synopses via the usual encyclopedic resources. Even David Shepard’s
expertly curated 2002 Kino compilation “D.W. Griffith’s Biograph Shorts” does
not include it.
It features the first “movie star,” Florence Lawrence AKA
Florence Bridgwood. This is one of no fewer than 81 films that she shot that
year. She was anonymous for most of that year, as Biograph, the studio she
worked for, did not list players in the credits, as a rule. Neither did any of
the other American studios. Why?
First, film was disreputable among stage actors, akin to a legit
film actor using their real name in a porn movie today. Second, the producers
were afraid that player identification would create a star system that would
take money out of their pockets. They were right, but the Hollywood system
introduced a branding concept when it came to players the audiences responded
to, and everyone wound up making more money.
At the time, though, film production companies had a chokehold
on the means, and manner, of production. Although fans wrote in asking who
Lawrence was, the studio would not name her. Finally, when she and her husband,
director Harry Solter, went to Essanay Company to try and get better pay,
Essanay simply ratted them out to Biograph, which fired them.
Fortunately, Carl Laemmle, the feisty independent who
started Universal, took them on, and started using Lawrence’s name in
advertising. Sales skyrocketed, and soon all the studios were busy building and/or
manufacturing stables of “stars.”
Florence Lawrence |
The film’s plot description: “A bored Lady Helen goes
slumming as a domestic in a boarding house. There she falls in love with a
sensitive young musician. The other women in house are jealous, and accuse her
of trying to steal the musician’s violin.”
All this in eight minutes? It really deserves a look. The
Freudian implications of the violin alone make it worth watching. And this begs
the question of why it’s not readily available. In an ideal world, all the
films in the Registry would be collected, annotated coherently, and made available
to all and sundry. However, there are immense problems with rights and
licensing, to begin with; revenue streams still issue forth form the screening
of many of these classics as well. That’s a task I wouldn’t envy anyone
attempting.
But – these designations of significance are surely for a
reason. What does it mean when we can’t grasp those cultural artifacts that we
deem important? (Insert my generic rant on the lack of funding for cultural
endeavors that would only interest a few folks.) Well, if we can spend all that
money and time on missiles, celebrity freaks, and traffic-camera tickets, we
can throw a few bucks and a little effort into the preservation and propagation
of art as well.
The NFR
Project is an attempt to review all the films listed in the National Film
Registry, in chronological order. Next time: ‘Princess Nicotine: or, The Smoke
Fairy.’
Yes, it's now available on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_obgy18GVhA
ReplyDelete