Sergei Serebryakov plays the tormented center of Andrey Zvyagintsev's "Leviathan." |
By
BRAD WEISMANN
Leviathan
2014
Dir:
Andrey Zvyagintsev
Prod:
Sergey Melkumov, Alexander Rodnyansky, Marianna Sardarova
Scr:
Oleg Negin, Andrey Zvyagintsev
Phot:
Mikhail Krichman
The
opening shots of the film start with long, still shots of an impassive-looking
landscape. Cut to a road, wandering bewildered toward a village in the
distance, a power line looping along beside it. Cut to rotting hulks
half-submerged in the water. “Leviathan” is a visual poem that enwraps a
Job-like narrative of dispossession and hypocrisy.
Gossip
first. It’s easy to see why most of the big shots in Russia didn’t like
“Leviathan.” It makes Russia’s Church and State, the twin props and guiding
purpose of Putin, look like Hammer-horror Twins of Evil, bent on crushing
opponents with a sense of being divinely entitled to do so.
Russia’s
Ministry of Culture funded 35 percent of this production. The conservative political
over this film, which termed it anti-Russian and unpatriotic, means that the
Ministry will now impose more restrictive guidelines for funding future
projects, ones that will not “defile” the national culture.
Zvyagintsev’s
film is a stately examination of life in modern times that might be staged in
any country where power, influence, and money make things happen. A corrupt
mayor in the distant rural province of Murmansk seeks the ramshackle, ancestral
home of a cranky independent handyman. The handyman’s old Army buddy, now an
up-and-coming Moscow lawyer, comes to assist him. As tempers flare, the stakes
rise and eminent domain is declared. The conflict spirals out of control, as
individual flaws serve as tripwires for the destruction of lives.
However,
this is no cynical sermon – it digs much deeper. No character is allowed less
than a three-dimensional presentation, making sympathies had to place. The
clear delineation and development of character here gives the film a novelistic
feel. Everyone carries the seeds of destruction here, all the way down to the
handyman’s rebellious teenage son. A clergyman endorses ruthlessness. Friends
betray friends. The problem isn’t political – it’s personal. The cognitive
dissonance is deafening.
A
patient camera sets up and lets an excellent ensemble cast, including Sergei
Serebryakov, Elena Lyadova, and Roman Madynov, go to work. The behavior
oscillates through anguish, desire, forgiveness, rant, and drinking. Lots and
lots of drinking. An amazing and endless procession of tall water glasses full
of vodka kept bolting down various hatches, and I wonder if Putin was mad about
this as well. (I do seem to remember some Russian friends of mine in the 1980s
who did indeed drink like that, all day long, and somehow not die. I think the
chain-smoking must have bolstered their immune systems.)
“Leviathan”
is unwelcome to some because it is tragic. But its searing, observant honesty,
rigorous construction, and luminous compositions give it the feel of a classic.
Russia is now going through what American artists experienced during the late
1980s, when the National Endowment for the Arts was politicized. Or in the
1950s, during America’s Second Red Scare. Or Soviets under Stalin . . . Censorship
we will always have with us. Fortunately, “Leviathan” got out before that
particular barn door was closed.
No comments:
Post a Comment