Thursday, May 29, 2025

NFR Project: Marian Anderson sings at the Lincoln Memorial

 

NFR Project: ‘Marian Anderson: the Lincoln Memorial Concert’

Filmed April 9, 1939

Marian Anderson (1897-1993) was one of the most gifted contraltos of the 20th century. Her only problem – she was Black.

Fighting prejudice every step of the way, she trained with various voice teachers and finally made an impact with a recital held with the New York Philharmonic on Aug. 26, 1925. People loved her rich, velvety voice, which expressed itself with precision and grace. However, because of her skin color, many times she could not get access to traditional classical-music venues in America.

So she went to Europe to study and perform. There she became incredibly popular, building a reputation, and notably establishing a friendship with the composer Sibelius. Her increased reputation led to more concert appearances in the U.S., but again she had problems being accommodated in hotels and restaurants due merely to her skin color. Friends would house and feed her -- including Albert Einstein.

In 1939, she attempted to give a concert at Washington, D.C.’s Daughters of the American Revolution Constitution Hall, which had a whites-only policy. She was denied. She then tried to secure the use of the auditorium of D.C.’s Central High School – and was again turned down, this time by the District of Columbia Board of Education. Thousands of her supporters were pissed, and a coalition of Black activists got to work.

Finally, Secretary of the Interior Harold L. Ickes was convinced to stage her recital on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial. This they did on Easter Sunday, April 9, 1939. The open-air concert was attended by more than 75,000 people, and was carried on NBC radio. “Genius, like Justice, is blind,” declared Ickes.

Anderson sang her heart out. She sang “My CVountry ‘Tis of Thee,” the aria “O mio Fernando” from Donizetti’s “La Favorita”, and Schubert’s “Ave Maria.” After a brief intermission, she sang three spirituals, “Gospel Train,” “Travelin’”, and “Nobody Knows the Trouble I’ve Seen.” She was applauded frenetically. For once, a Black artist stood up to the racists that controlled the American culture, and triumphed over them with a concert heard by millions.

She continued her career. She sang for the troops during World War II and the Korean War. She headlined on live TV on June 15, 1953, broadcast on both NBC and CBS. Finally, on January 7, 1955, she became the first Black singer to appear on the stage at the Metropolitan Opera. She continued to work extensively until her retirement form singing in 1965.

Only excerpts of her concert were released on newsreel film at the time, but the entire performance was recorded on film and archived. Today we can see and hear her thrilling performance, and wonder now what kind of society made it so hard for her to shine her light for everyone.

The NFR is one writer’s attempt to review all the films listed in the National Film Registry in chronological order. Next time: The Middleton Family at the New York World’s Fair.

Tuesday, May 27, 2025

NFR Project: 'Gunga Din' (1939)

 

NFR Project: ‘Gunga Din’

Dir: George Stevens

Scr: Joel Sayre, Fred Guiol

Pho: Joseph A. August

Ed: Henry Berman

Premiere: Feb.17, 1939

117 min.

It’s one of the most successful adventure films of all time, structured perfectly to propel its story forward. It took many writers to get it into shape. It has since drawn fire for its pro-imperialist, fundamentally racist foundations.

The movie is derived very loosely from the famous poem by Rudyard Kipling. It’s set in India, during the days when the British Empire ruled it. A sect of religious fanatics, the Thugees, threaten to overthrow English rule. Arrayed against them is the British army, and three sergeants – Cutter (Cary Grant), MacChesney (Victor McLaglen), and Ballantine (Douglas Fairbanks Jr.) The three are happy-go-lucky soldiers who aren’t afraid of a fight. One of their regimental bhistis (water carriers), Gunga Din, (played by the white Sam Jaffe in brownface). Din longs to be a soldier, but is looked down on as a mere servant. Ballantine, shortly to end his enlistment and retire, is mocked by his two friends.

A fight they get. First, they are sent out to discover what happened to an outpost that has lost contact with headquarters. There they find the Thugees in strength, and they fight their way to safety in a well-staged set piece of a battle. The three return to base, but Cutter soon goes astray. He wants to loot a hidden temple high in the mountains, but is placed in the stockade to prevent this. He escapes with the help of Din and an elephant.

The temple is found, but it is full of Thugees who are planning an uprising against the regiment. Cutter sends Din to warn the others, then gets himself captured. MacChesney and Ballantine come to his rescue (Ballantine signs reenlistment papers to do so), but are captured as well. There they hear from the sinister Guru of the Thugees (another white man in brownface, Eduardo Cianelli), who outline his plan for the destruction of the regiment.

The regiment arrives, and the three try desperately to warn them, to no avail. Din climbs to the top of the temple and sounds the alarm on a bugle saving the regiment – and is shot down for his pains. The enemy is routed, and the three are back together again, somewhat worse for wear. Din is posthumously made a corporal.

The script was worked on by Joel Sayre and Fred Guiol, working from an outline created by the great writing team of Ben Hechy and Charles MacArthur. Additional rewrites were wrung out of Leston Cohen, James Colton, the famous novelist William Faulkner, Vincent Lawrence, Dudley Nichols, and Anthony Veiller.

Despite all these cooks, the broth comes out tasty. The action is inventive, streamlined, and continuous, broken up only by effective comic scenes. It’s a boys’ film – the only woman in the scenario is dispensed with rather quickly. The movie has energy, flair, and wit.

The problems? Well, naturally, the movie is on the side of the Empire, portraying non-white character as either fools or devils. The primary Indian roles are played by white men in literal brownface and body makeup. This kind of taken-for-granted racism pervades the film.

The great German playwright Bertolt Brecht had these interesting words to say about it: “"I felt like applauding, and laughed in all the right places, despite the fact that I knew all the time that there was something wrong, that the Indians are not primitive and uncultured people but have a magnificent age-old culture, and that this Gunga Din could also be seen in a different light, e.g. as a traitor to his people, I was amused and touched because this utterly distorted account was an artistic success and considerable resources in talent and ingenuity had been applied in making it. Obviously artistic appreciation of this sort is not without effects. It weakens the good instincts and strengthens the bad, it contradicts true experience and spreads misconceptions, in short it perverts our picture of the world."

Interesting. Of course, he is correct in his observations. If you turn off your brain and watch it, you are bound to have a good time. Grant, MacLaglen, and Fairbanks are all perfect for their roles, and their banter is top-notch. Director Stevens creates two battles, the latter staged with hundreds of extras, and handles those conflicts with flair. In the end, the movie is irresistible, despite its imperialistic underpinnings.

The NFR is one writer’s attempt to review all the films listed in the National Film Registry in chronological order. Next time: Marian Anderson: the Lincoln Memorial Concert.

Friday, May 23, 2025

NFR Project: 'Gone with the Wind' (1939)

 


NFR Project: ‘Gone with the Wind’

Dir: Victor Fleming (and four others)

Scr: Sidney Howard (and 14 others)

Pho: Ernest Haller

Ed: Hal C. Kern, James E. Newcom

Premiere: Dec. 15, 1939

221 min.

It’s the ultimate blockbuster. Based on a best-selling historical novel, Gone with the Wind is still the highest-grossing motion picture of all time. It is also the epitome of Hollywood style, a textbook example of how to create a stirring epic that still leaves room and bears focus enough to illuminate the lives of its imaginary characters.

Margareet Mitchell’s 1936 book, a literary pot-boiler, was so popular that it was quickly optioned for adaptation to the big screen. Producer David O. Selznick was determined to create the ultimate epic, and the run-up to filming included contributions by no fewer than 15 scriptwriters. Additionally, the competition for the lead role of Scarlett O’Hara meant that thousands of actresses were considered for the part. In the end, Selznick had a screenplay that told the mammoth story cogently. At the last, he found his Scarlett in the person of English actress Vivien Leigh.

The process of making the film was debilitating, requiring the efforts of five different directors to finish. Its enormous crowd scenes and awe-inspiring special effects were logistical nightmares to pull off. Thousands of extras were costumed, herded, and shot (with a camera, natch). Max Steiner’s brilliant score pumped the movie full of energy. Given the fine performances by the principals, the result is a luxurious four-hour visual feast that manages to be compelling on the human scale as well.

It’s a story of the American South. It’s the eve of the Civil War, and young Scarlett O’Hara (Leigh) is a treasured, and spoiled, oldest daughter of Gerald O’Hara (Thomas Mitchell), owner of the plantation Tara. She is selfish, narcissistic, and materialistic – but she is our heroine, and Leigh gives this Southern belle a flinty, stubbornly brave core that causes us to root for her, despite her obvious drawbacks (let’s face it, she’s a bitch).

Scarlett is obsessed with Ashley Wilkes (fellow English actor Leslie Howard), a planter who’s engaged to her do-good cousin Melanie (Olivia de Havilland). Scarlett frets and stews over her attraction to Ashley, but all this drama recedes into the background when war is declared and all the menfolk set out for what they think will be a brief campaign. Into the picture steps the anti-hero Rhett Butler (Clark Gable), an assured, amoral

Spitefully, Scarlett agrees to marry Melanie’s brother, Charles, who shortly after dies of pneumonia on the battlefield. Freshly widowed, Scarlett insists on dancing with Butler at a charity ball, scandalizing her peers. The two are obviously meant for each other, but their initial contacts are fraught with conflict.

The South’s inevitable losses begin to pile up, and soon Atlanta is under siege. Melanie gives birth, and she and Scarlett are brought out of the path of the advancing Union Army by Rhett and returned to Tara, now an abandoned and bereft locale. Scarlett swears that she and her family will never go hungry again.

In the aftermath of the War, the family toils in the fields in order to maintain their ownership of Tara. Scarlett tries to obtain needed tax money form Rhett, to no avail. She then steals her sister’s beau, the well-off store owner Frank Kennedy and saves the plantation. Scarlett proves to be a ruthless businesswoman, utilizing convict labor to staff her business interests.

She becomes a free woman again after her husband is killed leading an attack on the “poor trash” that threaten the safety of Atlanta’s (white) womenfolk. Free to marry, she accepts Rhett’s proposal.

Though they are wealthy, their marriage is a tempestuous one. They have a child together, but that daughter dies tragically. Finally, Rhett is determined to leave Scarlett, who asks for another chance. “What will I do?” she asks. “Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a damn,” he replies, and leaves. But Scarlett is not deterred; she realizes she really loves Rhett, not Ashley, and vows to get him back, considering that “tomorrow is another day!”

Scarlett is a difficult character to figure out. She is a proto-feminist figure, one who acts rather than is acted upon, as is the case with the film’s other female characters. However, she does define herself through her relationships with men, and was the case for most women at the time. She is willful and spirited, but the story goes out of its way to punish her for her independence. It is only her final affirmation that she will survive and succeed that breaks her out of the Hollywood trap of destroying a female character that challenges society’s norms.

Then there is the elephant in the room: slavery. Although their plight motivates the entirety of the film, Black characters are seldom to be found here, and when they are they are at best portrayed as benevolent children – at worst, as loud and threatening Negroes. Hollywood was just as racist as the rest of the country when the book was written and the film was made, and the procession of Black stereotypes – the whiny maid, the bossy “mammy”, the stupid groomsman – plods steadily through the movie. According to the film, slavery exists merely to suffice as plot points for the doings of the movie’s white characters. It would have you believe that the War was about states’ rights and the preservation of the South’s courtly, antebellum way of life.

The film’s lavish settings and big set pieces – the camera’s dolly shot, pulling back and back, revealing more and more dead and wounded Confederates in the Atlanta rail yards, is still stirring – are feasts for the eye. Never was so much effort put into a convincing remounting of history, prejudiced in the “Lost Cause” of the South though it is. Despite its numerous drawbacks, it still plays well today, a remarkable artifact from when Hollywood was king and no expense was too great to make a memorable film.

The NFR is one writer’s attempt to review all the films listed in the National Film Registry in chronological order. Next time: Gunga Din.

Tuesday, May 20, 2025

NFR Project: Harry Smith's ‘Early Abstractions: #1-5, 7, 10’ (1939-1956)

 

NFR Project: ‘Early Abstractions: #1-5, 7, 10’ (1939-1956)

Created by Harry Smith

Premiere: various

23 min.

Harry Smith (1923-1991) was a genius. He is best known today for compiling the famous 1952 Anthology of American Folk Music, which influenced countless musicians and listeners, and helped to fuel the folk boom of the early 1960s.

Smith himself swung wildly from obsession to obsession. He studied anthropology and the occult. He painted pictures, many of them lost or destroyed; he pioneered the use of psychotropic drugs. He was a mystic and a self-styled shaman.

His films were always works in progress. He was decades ahead of his time in that he created abstract animations, some painted directly on the film stock, others utilizing a cut-and-paste, stop-motion technique. His innovations inspired filmmakers as diverse as Stan Brakhage and Terry Gilliam.

The fruits of his painstaking labors are fascinating. They are a rush of changing shapes and colors, culminating in the kaleidoscope effects of Variation #10, which features mandalas, sephiras (kabalistic “trees of life”), spirals, cascades of tarot cards, and demonic and Buddhist symbols.

Smith, in his own inimitable way, describes his output below.

Per EM Arts --

“My cinematic excreta is of four varieties: - batiked abstractions made directly on film between 1939 and 1946, optically printed non-objective studies composed around 1950, semi-realistic animated collages made as part of my alchemical labours of 1957 to 1962, and chronologically superimposed photographs of actualities formed since the latter year. All these works have been organised in specific patterns derived from the interlocking beats of the respiration, the heart and the EEG Alpha component and should be observed together in order, or not at all, for they are valuable works, works that will live forever - they made me gray.

No. 1: Hand-drawn animation of dirty shapes - the history of the geologic period reduced to orgasm length.

No. 2: Batiked animation, etc. etc. The action takes place either inside the sun or in Zurich, Switzerland.

No. 3: Batiked animation made of dead squares, the most complex hand-drawn film imaginable.

No. 4: Black-and-white abstractions of dots and grill-works made in a single night.

No. 5: Color abstraction. Homage to Oscar Fischinger - a sequel to No. 4.

No. 7: Optically printed Pythagoreanism in four movements supported on squares, circles, grill-works and triangles with an interlude concerning an experiment.

No. 10: An exposition of Buddhism and the Kabala in the form of a collage. The final scene shows Aquatic mushrooms (not in No. 11) growing on the moon while the Hero and Heroine row by on a cerebrum.”

Harry Smith from Film-makers’ Cooperative Catalogue 3, pp. 57-58

Sitting down to a intensely focused session of viewing his films, it is easy to see the hallucinogenic thrusts of his work, which seeks to overwhelm the visual sense of the viewer and push them into a transcendent state. Nearly a century after their creation, they are still ahead of their time, full of mystery and the excitement of seeing everything with otherworldly eyes.

The NFR is one writer’s attempt to review all the films listed in the National Film Registry in chronological order. Next time: Gone with the Wind.

Thursday, May 15, 2025

NFR Project: 'Destry Rides Again' (1939)

 

NFR Project: ‘Destry Rides Again’

Dir: George Marshall

Scr: Henry Myers, Gertrude Purcell

Pho: Hal Mohr

Ed: Miton Carruth

Premiere: Dec. 29, 1939

95 min.

Another curious selection by the National Film Registry. A pleasant film, but there is little that is remarkable about it.

The film is a Western, a comedy, and a musical all wrapped into one. It concerns the Old West town of Bottleneck, in which there is little enforcement of the laws, leading to chaos controlled only by the corrupt actions of saloon owner Kent (Brian Donlevy) and the tobacco-chewing mayor Slade (Samuel S. Hinds). When the town’s sheriff is murdered for trying to interfere with some criminal behavior, the town drunk Wash (Charles Winninger) is cynically chosen by the bad guys to serve as his replacement.

However, Wash takes his new job seriously, stops drinking, and hires the son of a famous lawman, Tom Destry Jr. (Jimmy Stewart) to serve as deputy. Destry shows up in town, wearing no guns and promoting the peaceful solution of the town’s problems. He is immediately mocked and despised by the citizenry. However, the bad guys underestimate him. First he proves to be a crack shot, then he uncovers the mystery of the previous sheriff’s murder.

He also wins the affections of Frenchy, the dance-hall girl (Marlene Dietrich) who is Kent’s companion and fellow crook. Destry apprehends one of Kent’s gang, but a gang of badmen release the prisoner from the jail, shooting Wash fatally in the process. An incensed Destry straps on his guns and rallies the whole town to attack Kent’s saloon and overthrow his reign of terror.

The film was a departure for Dietrich, who had appeared in a lavish series of films, most directed by Josef von Sternberg, but was now not deemed to be star material. She took a pay cut to play Frenchy, which she pulls off with grace and panache, singing several musical numbers along the way (this character was parodied by Madeline Kahn in Blazing Saddles). She proves to be as adept doing comedy as she does the drama of the film.

This is Jimmy Stewart’s first Western, remarkably; the iconic, brooding Westerns he made with Anthony Mann were more than a decade away.

The NFR is one writer’s attempt to review all the films listed in the National Film Registry in chronological order. Next time: Early Abstractions.

Monday, May 12, 2025

NFR Project: 'Cologne: From the Diary of Ray and Esther' (1939)

 

NFR Project: ‘Cologne: From the Diary of Ray and Esther’

Dir: Esther and Ray Dowidat

Scr: Esther and Ray Dowidat

Pho: Esther and Ray Dowidat

Ed: Esther and Ray Dowidat

Premiere: 1939

15:30 

Home movies are exactly that – records of family life, a way of preserving the memory of loved ones. In this case, the home movie becomes an ambitious documentary that gives us the portrait of a small town in America in the 1930s.

First, do read Scott Simmon’s excellent essay on the film, which you can click on here. He makes the point that the filmmakers, married couple Esther and Dr. Ray Dowidat, were possessed of a very professional spirit. Their film covers the time period from July to September, 1939, and profiles the tiny town of Cologne, Minnesota, pop. 350, located southwest of Minneapolis.

The film starts with a literal overview of the town – a panoramic taking-in of the town from its highest points. It discusses the nature of the inhabitants – mostly of German and Dutch descent – and provides a pocket history of the town, once an important rail junction but now a sleepy backwater. We see various citizens doing their jobs (fortunately, Dowdidat had access to a bright spotlight, and used it to record interior scenes fairly clearly). We go to the local saloon.

The film moves briskly along, punctuated by written passages from the Dowidats’ “diary” entries, which serve as a guide and as a framing device. The end result is a well-crafted film that belies its origins as a hobby, and rises to the level of homespun art.

The NFR is one writer’s attempt to review all the films listed in the National Film Registry in chronological order. Next time: Destry Rides Again.

Friday, May 9, 2025

NFR Project: 'The City' (1939)

 

NFR Project: ‘The City’

Dir: Ralph Steiner, Willard Van Dyke

Scr: Pare Lorentz, Henwar Rodakiewicz, Lewis Mumford

Pho: Ralph Steiner, Willard Van Dyke

Ed: Theodore Lawrence

Premiere: 1939

43:43

This documentary is one that advocates for a new kind of living space – the suburbs.

This film was produced under the auspices of a coalition of urban planners. It seeks to outline the nature of American city structures, decries the negative aspects of urban life, and posits “planned communities” to take their place. It was firt shown at the New York World’s Fair in 1939.

The movie is simply one of visuals married to a voiceover narration. In the first third of the film, we are taken on a survey of the typical American small town, adjacent to the country’s rural roots. Then we move into an indictment of the big city, decrying its negative influence on its inhabitants. Then we are whisked away to admire the virtues of the suburbs – an integration of nature and the man-made landscape, single-family homes with lawns, all inhabited by white people. It’s a vision that would come to fruition after World War II, when Levittown and its descendants began to cover the landscape.

The film is impressively matched up with an Aaron Copland score (his first for film), and sonorous narration by Morris Carnovsky. The argument for a reconstruction of American living space is somewhat persuasive, but then this film is on a mission of advocacy, and the images and words are in the service of that vision. The suburbs, it turns out, came with their own drawbacks, economic and environmental. However, at the time this film was made, there was little thought given to a different way of life than the crowded, congested stresses of urban living.

The NFR is one writer’s attempt to review all the films listed in the National Film Registry in chronological order. Next time: Cologne: From the Diary of Ray and Esther.

Thursday, May 8, 2025

NFR Project: 'Only Angels Have Wings' (1939)

 

NFR Project: ‘Only Angels Have Wings’

Dir: Howard Hawks

Scr: Jules Furthman, Howard Hawks

Pho: Joseph Walker

Ed: Viola Lawrence

Premiere: May 15, 1939

121 min.

This film, one of cinema’s great adventure dramas, is considered the epitome of the Howard Hawks style. Director Hawks left a distinctive fingerprint on many of his films – so much so that this particular kind of film is regularly referred to as “Hawksian.”

The Hawksian world is inhabited by cynical, tough-talking men. They face danger bravely and with a dismissive humor. A man is what he does, or in the worst case, what he cannot do. The Hawksian woman is independent, tough-talking, gifted with the ability to trade wisecracks with the guys. Together they create a miniature society of daredevils, people who inhabit the dangerous margins of life to fulfill tasks that ordinary people would balk at.

In this case, the scene is set in an imaginary South American country, in the town of Barranca. Here Geoff Carter (Cary Grant) leads a ragtag bunch of flyers whose job it is to fly mail and supplies up and over an intimidating range of Andean mountains inland. The company must make its deliveries in order to win a lucrative contract, despite hazards such as fog, storm, and bird strikes.

Into this milieu falls Bonnie Lee (perky Jean Arthur), an entertainer off the boat with a minimum of baggage and a maximum of curiosity. Naturally, she falls for Geoff, but Geoff was spurned by a woman over his risk-taking, so he’s sour on the idea of women, and emotion in general.

Onto the scene steps MacPherson (the great silent star Richard Barthlemess), a flyer with a checkered past who wants to get back into the game. It turns out that he bailed out of a burning plane, leaving his mechanic to die. That mechanic was the brother of The Kid (Thomas Mitchell), Geoff’s right-hand man. Despite everyone’s prejudice against him, Geoff takes him on.

It also turns out that MacPherson is married to Judy (Rita Hayworth, in her star-making turn) – the woman who broke Geoff’s heart. Their reconnection is bitter.

The Kid’s eyesight is failing, so Geoff must ban him from flying. Another dangerous mission comes up, and Geoff is all set to fly it when Bonnie accidentally shoots him. MacPherson must go, and the Kid volunteers to go with him in a new plane designed to fly over the high peaks.

The plane stalls out in the thin atmosphere, and the flying duo are forced to turn back. They run into a flock of buzzards, some of which crash through the windscreen, crippling the Kid and setting the engines on fire. MacPherson, struggling mightily, brings the plane back safely.

The Kid dies of his injuries. MacPherson, having redeemed himself, is welcomed by the other pilots. Geoff finally lets Bonnie know that he wants her to stay. Can she stand the uncertainty of not knowing whether he’ll come back alive from his job or not? The answer is a pretty confident yes.

The movie is filled with distinct characters, all cracking wise. Sig Rumann, who normally played pompous leaders or villains, actually gets a sympathetic part here and plays it well. The film, crowded with action, moves along at a dizzying pace. Add plenty of flying shots, supplemented by some good model work, and you have a strikingly engaging story on your hands.

Paradoxically, the gruff gents who work for the ragtag airline are actually sentimental fools. Their feelings of loss when one of their number crashes and dies are palpable. There are guys who care deeply about each other, and about their mission. It is their determination to be tough that makes them seem so abrasive, callous even. Hawks is careful to show us this aspect of their emotional lives, sublimated into anger and alcohol abuse.

Joseph Walker’s cinematography is top-notch; the settings are shrouded in fog and most of the action takes place at night. The noirish cast of the images perfectly suits the story of men gambling with their lives.

The NFR is one writer’s attempt to review all the films listed in the National Film Registry in chronological order. Next time: The City.

Monday, May 5, 2025

NFR Project: 'Under Western Stars' (1938)

 

NFR Project: ‘Under Western Stars’

Dir: Joseph Kane

Scr: Dorrell McGowan, Stuart E. McGowan, Betty Burbridge

Pho: Jack Marta

Ed: Lester Orlebeck

Premiere: April 20, 1938

65 min.

It is a dicey proposition to think that this Western musical earned its way into the National Film Registry. It is significant only in that it marks the first starring role of Roy Rogers (1911-1998), soon to become known as the “King of the Cowboys.”

Cowboy singing star Gene Autry (1907-1998) was responsible for Roy Rogers’ success. It seems that he was p.o.ed with Republic Pictures head Herbert Yates, who felt that he was solely responsible for Autry’s fame. 

Autry grew up the son of a preacher in Texas. He was a young man who worked as a telegrapher for a railroad, and sang and accompanied himself on guitar to pass the time away.

He finally won a recording contract, and in 1932 hit with his first big song, “That Silver-Haired Daddy of Mine”. He made it big in the movies in 1935 with his starring role in the bizarre Western/musical/sci-fi serial The Phantom Empire. He made 44 films in five years, and was everyone’s favorite singing cowboy, who could fight and shoot and ride adequately.

At this point in their association, Yates felt that he should get a cut of all of Autry's revenue. Autry, to put it mildly, disagreed.

Yates, feeling he could create another screen cowboy hero out of whole cloth, did so. He picked out a handsome, tuneful young man named Leonard Slye, who was part of the successful, original singing group the Son of the Pioneers. Yates changed his name to Roy Rogers, and stuck him in this film, which Autry was supposedly to play.

The story covers the election of Roy to Congress, where he works to ease the grip the local water company has on his constituents. That’s it. There is little to none of the chases, fights, or shootouts common to the Western B-movie to this point in time. There is a heck of a lack of water, and Rogers exposes other politicaians to the drought to make his point about releasing the life-giving water to his friends and neighbors. Roy is pleasant, winning, and sings like a bird. Even gifted with Autry’s old comic sidekick Smiley Burnette, the results are, shall we say, stultifying.

Well, it was a huge hit, and fostered Rogers’ career in film, on television, and via recordings through the rest of his life. For many, he is the personification of the happy singing cowpoke. He certainly was pleasant, and is attractive here – but he made better films (he racked up 125 before he was done).

The NFR is one writer’s attempt to review all the films listed in the National Film Registry in chronological order. Next time: Only Angels Have Wings.

Thursday, May 1, 2025

NFR Project: 'The River' (1938)

 

NFR Project: ‘The River’

Dir: Pare Lorentz

Scr: Pare Lorentz

Pho: Floyd Crosby, Willard Van Dyke, Stacy Woodard

Ed: Lloyd Nosler, Leo Zochling

Premiere: Feb. 4, 1938

31 min.

Pare Lorentz made a name for himself as a documentary filmmaker with The Plow that Broke the Plains in 1936. This examination of the Dust Bowl and plans for its mitigation was lauded by many, but abhorred by some as it appeared to them to be government propaganda. I wrote about it here.

For his second great documentary, Lorentz chose to cover the Mississippi River, that great avenue of commerce and travel. Once again, there was a didactic side to the film – Lorentz brings up deforestation and overfarming, and posits the dam construction work of FDR’s Tennessee Valley Authority as the solution to flood control and recovery of farmland and forest.

Lorentz chose a lyrical, poetic approach to the subject. He invokes the might of the river, and reels off a list of its tributaries in Whitmanesque style. He covers the river’s past, giving us shots of abandoned Southern mansions and including a quote from Robert E. Lee. Then he turns to the present, outlining the region’s problems with water and advocating government interventions to fix it.

The film does not deal in concrete specifics – the images are generic, and are chosen for their aesthetic beauty. Men and mules are silhouetted against the sky; water drips, meanders, and rushes. The Virgil Thomson score is outstanding, providing depth and weight to the scenes that are edited together. This time, Lorentz followed a filming schedule and created a budget, allowing him to work efficiently and with more assured focus.

Once again, there was some trouble with viewers and critics, who found it to be pushing the government’s agenda, which it certainly is. But Lorentz’s strong sense of imagery, backed up by an equally strong poetic narration (which was nominated for the Pulitzer Prize in poetry), transcends the programmatic aspect of the film, giving us a stirring portrait of natural and man-made forces at work.

The NFR is one writer’s attempt to review all the films listed in the National Film Registry in chronological order. Next time: Under Western Stars.