Sunday, November 14, 2010

Sternberg's "Underworld": The Peacock and the Mirror

Josef von Sternberg was an indispensable pain in the ass. More on that later.

We're spoiled. 35 years ago, the only way to see a film not in current release was to hit the art houses, surf pre-cable television, or scrounge up a 16-mm film and accompanying projection system.

The advent of VHS and DVD gave everyone a ticket to the movies, and made critics, curators and analysts of us all. Still, like a spoiled brat I mope about, yearning for those titles on my wish list that I haven't seen yet. I am dying to see Marcel Carne's "Hotel du Nord," or the obscure yet fascinating-sounding 1935 Swiss feature "The Eternal Mask," and long to own copies of Edgar Ulmer's "The Black Cat" and the 1932 "Island of Lost Souls." Even much early Jean Renoir and "The Magnificent Ambersons" are not available in Region 1 (North American technology-compatible) versions.

So, when I get to cross off THREE films at once, I'm ecstatic. Thanks to the wonderful folks at Criterion, "3 Silent Classics by Joseph von Sternberg" is finally here, and I finally got to bump off the first American gangster film feature, his wonderful 1927 "Underworld." ("The Last Command" and "The Docks of New York" complete the Criterion package.)


To be sure, von Sternberg didn't invent the genre -- D.W. Griffith appears to have in his 1912 short drama "The Musketeers of Pig Alley." Louis Feuillade's "Fantomas"/"Les Vampires"/"Judex" serials trilogy of 1913-1916 first posits the idea of the city as a landscape of criminal terror. The evil mastermind, the shifts of identity, and above all the concept of a gritty parallel universe where values are reversed all start here. Fritz Lang elaborates on these themes masterfully in his own early works, "The Spiders," "Dr. Mabuse the Gambler" and "Spies."

Early Depression Era paranoia and cynicism helped feed "Underworld"'s mood. The screenplay was written by Ben Hecht, the ex-Chicago newsman who co-created the quintessential world-weary view of city life in the play "The Front Page," and went on to have a hand on many of the most significant American screenplays of the Studio Era.

The notoriously assured and imperious Sternberg ignored what he pleased of Hecht's work, infuriating the writer, who asked to have his name removed from the credits -- until the picture became a smash hit and earned him the very first Oscar for Best Original Story. Janet Bergstrom's fascinating and top-notch visual essay on the "Underworld" DVD is undergirded with rigorous research, and discusses the post-scenario revisions by the director.

At least at this stage of his career, Sternberg was making changes that helped to tell the story. He assumes the viewer's intelligence, jumping into the story without preamble and letting us determine character and relationships as the narrative breezes along. The central romantic triangle, consisting of crime boss Bull Weed (George Bancroft), his intellectual drunkard minion Rolls Royce (Clive Brok) and moll Feathers (Evelyn Brent) are defined through image and action, not through intertitle or indication.

Sternberg's technical knowledge allowed him to turn down the bright, flat studio lights and achieve a depth and dimensionality, a gradation of shades, not seen in any contemporary's work save for F.W. Murnau. His visually ravishing mise en scene, even in locations of squalor, enriches the viewing experience immensely. His choices inform films in the genre all down the line -- from Hawks' "Scarface" (the enormous blinking advertising sign that declares "THE CITY IS YOURS") to Huston's "Maltese Falcon" (the criminal's final, thoughtful descent down a staircase to his fate) and beyond.

Although he later scorned his work on this film in his autobiography "Fun in a Chinese Laundry," Sternberg would become less attached to his characters, and to exploring emotions outside the realm of desire -- for sex, for power, for control. He outsmarted himself. While the look of his films became more sumptuous and complex (and expensive), his narratives lose their way. His sense of sureness about his talents led to an infuriatingly overbearing and controlling manner that eventually wore out his welcome in the film community.

An ironic touch in "Underworld" is his use of Larry Semon in a supporting role as "Slippy" Lewis, part thug, part comic relief. Semon, one of silent film's now-ignored popular figures, at the time was trying to fight his way back from a massive debt and loss of artistic control. He had been, at one time, Chaplin's rival; however, his insistence on expensive production work and waning directorial skill killed his career.

In "Underworld," his goony whiteface character is replaced by a more measured performance -- one that takes him seriously as an actor and reveals levels of dignity unthinkable to viewers who have only seen his comic films. A year after "Underworld" was made, Semon was dead -- a victim of a combination of physical and emotional breakdown. Would that Sternberg had seen that writing on the wall.


Von Sternberg, like his fellow directorial adapters of the faux "von," von Stroheim and von Trier, combined innovation and audacity, arrogance and insight, producing work that intrigues despite its increasing tone-deafness. "Underworld" and other gems show him at the height of his powers.

Friday, October 8, 2010

Roy Ward Baker, R.I.P.: Architect of horror

Film and television director -- via blog.saint.org. Here's the New York Times obit. A major architect of the imaginations of my generation, he made some of Hammer Film Production's best -- and campiest -- horror films. On TV, he worked on some of the best British series -- "The Avengers," "The Champions," "The Saint," "Danger UXB," "Fairly Secret Army" and "The Irish R.M." This analysis of his achievements is the best to date, written by Tom Vallance in the Independent.

His best-respected film is "A Night to Remember," a retelling of the sinking of the Titanic praised as far more faithful to fact than the maudlin "Titanic," released five years earlier . . . and the maudlin "Titanic" released 39 years later.


He was just getting started. He helmed the third Quatermass film -- the highly successful film series about a British professor who lucks repeatedly into foiling invasions from outer space.
"Quatermass and the Pit," aka "Five Millions Years to Earth," is genuinely disturbing, and sports strong performances from Andrew Keir, James Donald, Barbara Shelley, and Julian Glover:


[James Donald is one of the most underregarded of film actors. Known best as the chiding voice of reason in the war movies "Bridge on the River Kwai" and "The Great Escape," roles such as this and others like Winkle in "The Pickwick Papers" and Theo in "Lust for Life" show his range and depth.]
 The poster is very clear: "Not for the mentally immature."
Then, his masterpiece: "The Vampire Lovers"! This first in the loose Carmilla trilogy by Hammer hits all the pleasure points -- vampires, forbidden sexuality, graphic violence, and those hard, bright colors that made watching a Hammer film much like going on an acid trip.


Ingrid Pitt, Peter Cushing, Kate O'Mara, and the immortal Pippa Steel!
Pippa Steel -- chaste above, naughty below. The perfect neo-Victorian fantasy figure.

Next, the delicious awfulness of "The Scars of Dracula": with the wonderful Christopher Lee and Patrick Troughton -- "No one can escape the all-encompassing evil of the humans that do his bidding!"

. . . and the ultimate gender-bender, "Dr. Jekyll and Sister Hyde".
 He moved on to Amicus, a no-budget rival to Hammer, and there diected several of their "horror portmanteau" films, which relied on the formula of telling several shorter tales within an overarching framework. "Asylum" is a decent little horror anthology with a script by Robert Bloch and a slew of talent, including Peter Cushing, Herbert Lom, and Patrick Magee, and a very young Charlotte Rampling and Robert Powell. He also did for them "The Vault of Horror
 and "The Monster Club":
" -- And Now the Screaming Starts!" is a pleasant little disembodied-hand-out-for-revenge subgenre entry fro Baker and Amicus:

Meanwhile, Baker directed many of "The Avengers" 1968 episodes:
And followed with more distinguished BBC fare as his career continued. All in all, a very active and satisfying creative life. His film and television work is clear, effective and convincing, even on the silliest projects imaginable. Time and again, he gets great performances out of high-quality actors in absurd situations. He scared the pants off of my generation at the drive-in, in the balcony and on late-night TV. His lurid imagination, leavened with a droll wit, strongly informed my aesthetic sensibilities. Cheers!

Friday, September 24, 2010

Paris on film, Part Four: Entr’acte


So far, we’ve examined Hollywood perspectives on the French capital. These two anthology films provide a palate-cleansing transition to the Gallic sensibility – Parisian films made by Parisians.

In reverse chronological order:

Paris, Je T’Aime
2006

18 short films, 22 directors, including the Coens, Alfonso Cuaron, Alain Chomet, Olivier Assayas . . . . Remarkably, it’s good! Striking, taut vignettes that veer from the comic to the tragic and make good use of the different arrondisements both in terms of setting and mood. Besides, when are you ever going to see Alexander Payne play the ghost of Oscar Wilde again?


Six in Paris
1965

Much harder to find, and more problematic to watch. The six are Claude Chabrol, Jean Douchet, Jean-Luc Godard, Jean-Daniel Pollet, Eric Rohmer and Jean Rouch. According to Sean Axmaker’s introduction on tcm.com, the project was pushed forward by actor/producer/director Barbet Schroeder (who acts in one sequence here and shows up in a sequence of “Paris, Je T’Aime 40 years later). The technological revolution of 16mm cameras with direct sound allowed this sextet of New Wave artists to unlock the camera from the tripod and have some fun, resulting in short narratives that, once again, span the humorous and the tragic.

What distinguishes “Six in Paris” from its latter bookend is the lack of awe. In it, the locales serve the story, do not draw attention to themselves (save for a brief, searing remark that no one goes to the Arc D’Triomphe save for tourists and politicians). For native filmmakers, Paris is at once much more and much less than myth – it’s home.

Next: Paris, the auteurs’ playground